| |
According
to a recent, Reuters report (June 21), researchers are
conducting new, long-term studies to confirm the therapeutic
properties of selenium.1
Background
Selenium was discovered in 1817 by Berzelius, a Swedish
chemistry professor. The mineral is present in the
earth’s crust and chiefly derived as a by-product
of copper refinery. Depending on soil composition,
selenium is most abundant in foods such as meats,
fish, and grains.2-3
Benefits
For more than 40 years, selenium has been recognized
as an essential nutrient. In 1957, Schwarz and Foltz4
established selenium as an essential trace element
in nutrition for the prevention of disease.
Low dietary levels of selenium in animals and humans
have been linked to several disease symptoms. In animals,
selenium deficiency has been associated with muscular
dystrophy in sheep and calves5,
liver necrosis in rats4,
liver and heart necrosis in pigs6,
and pancreatic atrophy and exudative diathesis in
chicks7. Human selenium
deficiency has been documented in the pathogenesis
and pathology of Keshan disease, a heart ailment observed
in people of the Chinese province of Keshan, a region
whose soil lacks adequate selenium levels.8
Myositis9 (muscle diseases
characterized by inflammation and degenerative changes),
pseudoalbinism10, whitening
of the fingernail beds9,
elevated creatinine kinase derived from muscles10,
macrocytosis10 (the presence of abnormally large red
cells in the blood), osteoarthropathy (Kashin-Beck
disease)11, and an increased
incidence of cardiovascular disease12
and cancer13 in humans are
also associated with low selenium levels.
Organic Vs. Inorganic Selenium
Plants absorb selenium from the soil and convert
it into organic forms that are easily assimilated.
For example, L-(+)-selenomethionine, an organic compound,
is the predominant form of selenium in wheat and cereals.14
L-(+)-Selenomethionine is rapidly and completely absorbed
from the gastrointestinal tract.15
Inorganic forms of selenium include sodium selenite
and sodium selenate; they are not normal food forms
of selenium. In comparing L-(+)-selenomethionine (LSM)
with its inorganic counterparts the following was
determined: 1) LSM is significantly better absorbed
and retained in the body than sodium selenite.15
2) In experimental animals supplemented with
LSM, sodium selenite, and selenocysteine, the highest
increase in tissue selenium levels was accomplished
with LSM.16 In addition,
studies have suggested that LSM has a slower, whole-body
turnover in comparison to sodium selenite. This means
there is greater efficiency in the reutilization of
selenium in complex with methionine.15
Due to the role of methionine in aiding the safe metabolism
of selenium, LSM is recognized as a safer form of
selenium than sodium selenite.17

L-(+)-Selenomethionine
Research
A large number of research papers are published on
selenium annually. Cancer prevention, antiviral defense,
immune-system enhancement, arthritis, and coronary
disease are some of the areas that have been explored.
Of the studies conducted on the therapeutic benefits
of selenium, Clark et al.18
serves as a landmark study. This 10-year study established
selenium as an anticarcinogen in humans. Although
selenium supplementation did not significantly affect
the incidence of basal cell or squamous cell skin
cancer, the focus of the study, it did significantly
reduce total cancer mortality, total cancer incidence,
and incidences of lung, colorectal, and prostate cancers
in the selenium-treated group. Because selenium’s
effects on cancer was not the original focus of the
study, critics argue that this study does not confirm
selenium's beneficial effects on cancer. Thus, this
study has generated interest in funding follow-up
research on selenium.
One follow-up study, funded by the National Cancer
Institute (NCI) and coordinated by the Southwest Oncology
Group (SWOG), is known as SELECT (Selenium and Vitamin
E Cancer Prevention Trial). It is a 12-year, prostate
cancer study conducted with 32,000 men from the United
States, Canada and Puerto Rico. The IND number for
this study is 58,212. The exclusive form of selenium
chosen by the NCI for this study is Sabinsa’s
Selenium SeLECT®. Sabinsa
will supply capsules of Selenium SeLECT®
as well as the placebo for the trial.
Selenium SeLECT®, a
registered trademark of Sabinsa Corporation, is supplied
as two grades of L-(+)-Selenomethionine, (LSM) an
organic, bioavailable and fully com-plexed (not a
dry blend of selenium and methionine) form of selenium.
Selenium SeLECT® Pure
contains a minimum of 400,000 mcg of elemental selenium
(40%) per gram, and Selenium SeLECT®
5000 (DCP blend), a trituration of LSM and dicalcium
phosphate, contains a minimum of 5,000 mcg of elemental
selenium (0.5%) per gram. Both grades are yeast and
allergen free andconform to USP monograph standards.
References:
- Vaporean, C. (2001) Selenium research points to
curative powers. Reuters.
- Selenium. http://www. encyclopedia.com
- Selenium in diet. http://www.thirdage.adam.com/ency/article/002414fod
.htm
- Schwarz, K. et al. (1957) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 79,
3292-3293.
- Muth, O. et al. (1958) Science 128, 1090.
- Eggert, R. et al. (1957) J. Anim. Sci. 16, 1037.
- Thompson, J. et al. (1970) J. Nutr. 100, 797-809.
- Li, G. et al. (1985) Hum. Pathol. 16, 602-609.
- Kien, C. et al. (1983) Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 37, 319-328.
- Vinton, N. et al. (1987) J. Pediatr. 111, 711-717.
- Giangqui, Y. et al. (1988) World Rev. Nutr. Diet
55, 98-152.
- Andrews, J. et al. (1981) Selenium and cadmium
status in blood of residents from low selenium high
cardiovascular disease area of southeastern Georgia.
In: Spallholz, J. et al. Selenium in Biology and Medicine.
Westport, CT, AVI Publishing, 348-353.
- Garland, M. et al. (1994) The epidemiology of selenium
and human cancer. In Frei, B. (ed.) Natural Antioxidants
in Human Health and Disease. San Diego, CA, Academic
Press, 263-281.
- Olson et al.(1970) Phytochemistry 9, 1181-1188.
- Swanson, C. et al. (1991) Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 54,
917-926.
- Deagan, J. et al. (1987) J. Nutr. 7, 91-98.
- Ip, C. (1988) J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 80, 258-264.
- Clark, L. et al. (1996) JAMA 276, 1957-1963.
|